👻🍞 The Ghost's Primary-Source Archive

The Ghost's Q Claim Audit

A response to the claim that there have been “1000’s of validations.” Each row quotes an original Q post, links the archived post, and sets it beside the documented public record. By The Ghost.

Read this first
  • Q's allegations of crimes are reported here as Q's own words. They are not endorsed, and nothing here says anyone is guilty of anything.
  • A rating of ambiguous, unverifiable or not borne out is not the same as proven false.
  • No overall “Q truth rate” is given. The rows are not a random sample, so a percentage would mislead.
  • Stratum A covers checkable claims in posts #1 to #120 (late Oct to Nov 2017). Stratum B is a later sample, biased toward claims that critics often cite. Stratum C checks lines that are often wrongly credited to Q.
  • Date window: Oct 28, 2017 to Dec 14, 2019, original Q posts only. Later influencer narratives are kept out of the Q rows.
  • Lines written by other anonymous posters, and lines wrongly credited to Q, are listed but excluded from the Q claims.
  • No open-ended or future deadline is marked as failed.
  • Limits: post numbers and times follow the qalerts.app archive, and excerpts were checked against it. Many claims share one premise (see “Shared premise”), so rows are not independent.

68 Q claims from original posts, plus 7 excluded rows. The list stops short of 100 because it was not padded.

Count by rating (not a truth rate)
  • Ambiguous / non-testable: 17
  • Unsupported / unverifiable: 16
  • Contradicted / failed prediction: 13
  • Accurate but already public: 8
  • Undated, not borne out to date: 6
  • Occurred, but undated or publicly foreseeable: 4
  • Misattributed later narrative (excluded): 4
  • Embedded non-Q text (excluded): 3
  • Inaccurate when posted: 3
  • Partial / qualified match: 1